8
I. BACKGROUND §8.1
II. SOIL AND SEDIMENT SAMPLING §8.2
Figure 8-1: Soil and Sediment Sampling Sites
III. SOIL AND SEDIMENT ANALYSIS RESULTS §8.3
Table 8-1: Tritium
Results in Soil and Sediment Samples
Table 8-2: Metals and Oil/Grease
Results in Soil and
Sediment Samples
§8.1 I. BACKGROUND
The analysis of soil and sediment as part of a routine environmental monitoring program can provide information regarding past releases to air or water. DOE guidance recommendsand Berkeley Lab performsannual soil and sediment sampling to determine long-term accumulation trends and baseline profiles.1 No other specific regulatory requirements exist for routinely assessing these media, although any contamination discovered by sampling must be handled according to federal and state hazardous waste regulations. Details on Berkeley Lab’s soil and sediment program are included in its Environmental Monitoring Plan.2 In 1998, sampling was done in November before the rainy season. All sampling results are presented in volume II.
§8.2 II. SOIL AND SEDIMENT SAMPLING
In 1998, soil samples from the top 2 to 5 centimeters (1 to 2 inches) of surface soils were collected from three locations around the site and one off-site environmental monitoring station. See Figure 8-1. Locations were chosen to coincide with ambient-air sampling stations. Samples were analyzed for gross alpha and gross beta radiation, gamma emitters, tritium, metals, moisture content, and pH. In 1998, soil samples were not analyzed for semivolatiles (as was done previously), because historical results demonstrated that these analytes in soils were consistently below practical quantification limits.
Sediment samples were collected during the same period from main and tributary creek beds of the North Fork of Strawberry Creek and Chicken Creek. See Figure 8-1. Sediment samples were analyzed for gross alpha and gross beta radiation, gamma emitters, tritium, metals, polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs), petroleum hydrocarbons (diesel fuel and oil and grease), and pH.
§8.3 III. SOIL AND SEDIMENT ANALYSIS RESULTS
All gross alpha, gross beta, and gamma-emitter results were similar to background levels of naturally occurring radioisotopes commonly found in soil and sediment. Tritium levels measured were comparable to results reported for these locations in previous years. In 1998, only three of the eight samples contained detectable levels of tritium. The maximum tritium level in soil was 0.059 becquerels per gram of soil near Building 69. The maximum tritium level in sediment was 0.042 Bq/g at the Chicken CreekMain location. Table 8-1 summarizes the soil and sediment analysis results for tritium.
|
Table 8-1 Tritium Results in Soil and Sediment Samplesa |
||
|
Sampling location |
Matrix |
Tritium (Bq/g)b |
|
Building 50 |
Soil |
<0.003c |
|
Building 69 |
Soil |
0.0589 |
|
Building 85 |
Soil |
<0.003c |
|
ENV-B13C |
Soil |
<0.003c |
|
Chicken Creek–Main |
Sediment |
0.0419 |
|
Chicken Creek–Tributary |
Sediment |
0.0142 |
|
North Fork Strawberry Creek–Main |
Sediment |
<0.003c |
|
North Fork Strawberry Creek–Tributary |
Sediment |
<0.003c |
|
a One sample per location b 1 Bq = 27 pCi c Result below detection limit |
||
Berkeley Lab is currently conducting a corrective action program under the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act of 1976 (RCRA) to investigate soil and groundwater tritium contamination near the National Tritium Labeling Facility. For a summary of the RCRA investigation, see §3.18. For groundwater monitoring results, see §6.11.
All results for metals analyses were also within normal levels for soil and sediment and well below regulatory levels.3 PCB results for sediment samples were near or below practical quantification limits. Measurements for pH were within the normal range for soils and sediments. The maximum level of oil and grease (960 mg/kg) was measured at the Chicken CreekTributary location. Oil and grease contamination is commonly associated with motorized vehicles on roads and parking lots. The Laboratory’s Cyclotron Road traverses the grade directly above the sampling site. This location will be sampled in future years to monitor any changes.
Table 8-2 shows metals (where at least one sample was above the limit of quantification) and oil and grease results.
| Table 8-2 Metals and Oil/Grease Results in Soil and Sediment Samplesa,d | |||||||||
|
Sample Location |
|||||||||
|
Soil |
Sediment |
||||||||
|
Analyte |
B50 mg/kg |
B69 mg/kg |
B85 mg/kg |
ENV-B13C mg/kg |
Chicken Creek– Main mg/kg |
Chicken Creek– Tributary mg/kg |
N. Fork Strawberry Creek–Main mg/kg |
N. Fork Strawberry Creek– Tributary mg/kg |
Regulatory criteria (TTLCb) mg/kg |
|
Arsenic |
6.8 |
8 |
4.8 |
5.6 |
2.3 |
4.3 |
5.3 |
7.8 |
500 |
|
Barium |
169 |
121 |
114 |
99 |
157 |
96 |
82 |
89 |
10,000 |
|
Beryllium |
1.1 |
NDc |
1.2 |
1 |
0.75 |
0.85 |
0.74 |
0.75 |
75 |
|
Cadmium |
NDc |
1.3 |
NDc |
NDc |
NDc |
NDc |
NDc |
NDc |
100 |
|
Chromium |
33 |
59 |
65 |
26 |
54 |
62 |
22 |
48 |
2,500 |
|
Cobalt |
8.1 |
8.7 |
11 |
5.6 |
8.5 |
9.3 |
6.9 |
6.8 |
8,000 |
|
Copper |
56 |
50 |
22 |
21 |
24 |
35 |
14 |
23 |
2,500 |
|
Lead |
61 |
36 |
9.2 |
93 |
33 |
39 |
10 |
35 |
1,000 |
|
Mercury |
0.2 |
NDc |
NDc |
0.22 |
NDc |
NDc |
NDc |
NDc |
20 |
|
Nickel |
35 |
49 |
49 |
23 |
41 |
41 |
21 |
22 |
2,000 |
|
Vanadium |
49 |
46 |
73 |
36 |
41 |
53 |
48 |
45 |
2,400 |
|
Zinc |
110 |
255 |
51 |
105 |
92 |
20 |
86 |
112 |
5,000 |
|
Oil & Grease |
– |
– |
– |
– |
130 |
960 |
180 |
210 |
– |
|
a One sample per location b Total Threshold Limit Concentration (22 California Code of Regulations 66261.24)3 c Result was below detection limit. d Results for antimony, molybdenum, selenium, silver, and thallium were all below practical quantification limits and are not reported in Table 8-2. These results, along with other non-TTLC metals (aluminum, boron, manganese, and iron), are included in volume II. | |||||||||