Berkeley Lab logo
spacer
Patent Group Home
Information for Inventors arrow
Forms arrow
Patents  
Confidential Information
Copyright arrow
Trademark
Computer Software arrow
Patent Publication Review (For LBNL Authors) arrow
Export Control
Humor
Patent Group Staff
LBNL Report /Publication Approvals (Patent Counsel only)
Intellectual Property Law Web Links
Copyright Notice & Disclaimers
Tech-Transfer
spacer
Webmaster
SEARCH
Phone Book A-Z Index Search
 
  Patent Group
  Computer Software and Intellectual Property Law
 

Computer Software and Copyright

19. Patent or Copyright, Which Is the Best Way to Protect a Computer Program?

As a programmer, you are probably wondering which form of protectionis appropriate for your particular software. This being a copyright guide, you might guess that copyright protection should be sought. In the majority of cases you would be right. There are a number of distinct differences between patent and copyright protection. One thing to remember is that the two are not mutually exclusive.

The most basic difference is the term of protection. As discussed earlier copyright protection can exist for 50 or more years. Patent protection, however, lasts for only 20 years from the date of filing.

This does not imply that patent protection is inferior. For one thing, patent protection can apply to the method or process. Remember that copyright protection does not protect the method, but the expression of the method. Patent law, on the other hand, can protect the method as well. Additionally, patent law has international implications that may afford a program greater protection.

However, while copyright protection is available the instant a work is fixed, patent protection applies only after the application is approved, which can take 18 months. Furthermore, statutory damages and criminal sanctions may not be available under patent law. A final consideration is cost. A copyright registration application is very inexpensive and simple while a patent application for software can be extremely costly in terms of both time and money.

There are finer distinctions which may make one or the other more advantageous to pursue. These are beyond the scope of this guide. In some cases a patent should be filed while in many others copyright protection suffices. Once again, the Patent Department will determine which method of intellectual property protection is best for a particular program.


* Written by John E. Wehrli, formerly of the Patent Department, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory. Available as LBL Report No. 38995.