Computer Software and Copyright
11. So What Is Copyright Protection?
Authors establish copyright protection once their original work is fixed.
People frequently ask, "If I can establish a copyright by simply fixing
my work, what is the advantage of registering my work with the
U.S.
Copyright Office?"
While an author may establish a copyright at fixation, he does not necessarily
establish the right to sue for infringement of that copyright. Generally,
in order for the author to sue for copyright infringement, the copyright
must be registered with the U.S. Copyright Office.
If the copyright is
registered within 3 months
of publication, then the author may be able to recover statutory damages
or attorney's fees, in addition to other relief, for infringement that
began before registration.
In addition, registration of a copyright within 5 years of publication
will compel the court to give the registered owner the benefit of the doubt
as to the validity of the registered party¹s ownership in a court
case, unless the other party can prove otherwise. The other party will
have the burden of proving that the registered owner does not have a valid
copyright.
Finally, the combination of registration and proper notice will remove
the defense known as "innocent infringement" from a defendant and the court
will assume that the world had been put on notice that the work was copyright-protected.
Therefore, if a computer program is going to be commercially marketed
or otherwise distributed to the public, it is usually a good idea to pursue
federal registration.
11.1 Publication
Usually, a work is registered with the U.S. Copyright Office after it has
been published. Publication, for the purpose of federal registration, is
defined as the year copies of the work are distributed to the public by
sale or other transfer of ownership, or by rental, lease, or lending; or
the year the work is first offered to a group of persons for purposes of
further distribution. It is this "year of first publication" that is used
with the copyright notice.
If a programmer distributes a computer program to a limited class for
a limited purpose, such as other programmers in his department for testing
or only to members of the Physics Division for beta testing or to outside
testers under a confidentiality (or nondisclosure) agreement, it may not
be considered publication.
However, if multiple copies of the computer program are available for
distribution to the general public, the sale or lending of a single copy
may constitute publication.
An Example
Let¹s say our friend Cliff Cybercop enters into negotiations with
several companies to license his Antihacker program. He sends the companies
a copy of the source code along with a nondisclosure agreement for evaluation.
This would not be considered publication. Furthermore, if he also sends
a copy of the source code to friends at other national labs or universities
for beta testing, this may also not constitute publication.
Now let¹s say that Cliff decides his program is perfect and license
offers fail to impress him. He places a notice on the internet that the
Antihacker program is for sale, even though he has only 2 copies. He gets
one order and sends off a copy to the requester. This may constitute publication.
This is so even if he gave the copy away, so long as he had more than one
copy and made them available to the general public.
It is important for the programmer to accurately determine the date of
first publication once approval to register a copyright has been granted.
Though an incorrect date may not invalidate the copyright, it can increase
the legal cost and effort required to enforce it.
11.2 Unpublished Computer Programs
A computer program that has been fixed but not published can still be registered
as an "unpublished work." However, once published a new registration application
must be submitted.
* Written by John E. Wehrli, formerly of the Patent Department, Lawrence Berkeley
National Laboratory. Available as LBL Report No. 38995.
|