It is the policy of Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory to conduct activities that contribute to its scientific and operational objectives in accordance with sound quality assurance and conduct of operations principles. These principles, as described in the Laboratory's Operating and Quality Management Plan (OQMP) (PUB-3111), are the basis for the Laboratory's standards for organization, process management, and performance assessments.
Application of OQMP principles is based on a graded approach, with consideration given to the unit's mission; its programmatic or operational significance; and its commitment to environment, safety, and health consequences for personnel and the general public.
The Laboratory Director is responsible for providing the institutional authority for the OQMP. The Director ensures the full cooperation of divisions in implementing the requirements of the plan.
The Associate Laboratory Director for Operations (ALDO) is responsible for (1) communicating the OQMP to all Laboratory divisions and other appropriate organizations and (2) ensuring its full implementation.
The Office of Institutional Assurance is responsible for (1) developing and maintaining the OQMP and (2) assessing implementation of the plan by divisions and other appropriate organizations.
Division directors and department heads are responsible for ensuring that OQMP requirements are communicated and implemented in their responsible areas.
Berkeley Lab employees are individually responsible for compliance with these requirements and for the quality of their work.
An appropriate management structure, a proficient staff, and a systematic approach in planning work functions are key elements in sustaining a satisfactory level of quality performance. Berkeley Lab organizations must:
A process is defined as a combination of people, materials, equipment, and
actions interacting to produce a product or service. The process is managed
by the application of system controls to assure the quality of the product or
service.
Berkeley Lab organizations must manage their work processes by:
Organizing the responsibilities, procedures, and controls for the organization's
functions requires the development and maintenance of documents that establish
the organization's method of operation. The operating documents must be
able to direct and inform affected personnel on how to perform their functions
in an efficient and safe manner. All hazards related to the functions and
the corresponding mitigation measures must also be identified and communicated
to the affected personnel. Operating documents include, but are not limited
to, manuals, notebooks, standard operating procedures, desk references,
instructions, and drawings.
Process control is intended to reduce the variation in work process, thereby improving performance and quality. Line managers responsible for programs and operations must review their core functions to ensure that appropriate controls are in place. The controls include, but are not limited to, the following:
Document control and records management are intended to ensure the availability of accurate information for Berkeley Lab work processes and other activities. Documents and records are managed to provide for retention, preservation, assurances of currency, and retrievability:
Berkeley Lab organizations must routinely (at least annually) evaluate their work performance to identify, correct, and prevent problems that may hinder the organization in achieving its scientific and operational objectives. Some of these assessments are required under the terms of the DOE/LBNL Contract between the University and DOE. Assessments can also affirm that objectives and goals are being met in accordance with LBNL/PUB-5520, UC Assurance Plan for LBNL.
Line managers and division administrators must periodically evaluate the performance of their work activities and take an active role in improving performance and seeking excellence. These assessments can be readiness reviews, design reviews, quality control inspections, program reviews, and any other evaluations to ensure that performance is at a satisfactory level.
Independent assessments are internal reviews performed routinely by the Environment, Health & Safety Division (EH&S); Internal Audit Services; the Office of Institutional Assurance (OIA); and the Safety Review Committee. These reviews are performed by technically and programmatically knowledgeable personnel within the Laboratory who do not have direct responsibility in the areas they assess. Each assessment organization has established protocols for conducting the reviews.
Peer reviews, which are a form of independent assessment, are evaluations of scientific and operational programs and projects conducted by peers in that particular field. Reviewers cannot have direct responsibility in the areas being reviewed.
This program directs divisions and other Berkeley Lab organizations to
self-evaluate their operations to ensure that environment, safety, and
health and quality assurance concerns are routinely addressed to promote
continuous improvement and excellence in these topical areas. The self-assessment
program provides a structured process to perform routine inspections; identify
issues; develop and track
corrective actions; conduct root cause analysis, and data monitoring and
analysis; and
institute lessons learned. The program elements and requirements are described
in the LBNL ES&H Self-Assessment
Program (PUB-5344) and the LBNL Self-Assessment Manual (PUB-3105).
Corrective actions are developed for issues (findings, concerns, and deficiencies) identified in an assessment, and are managed and tracked through resolution. Corrective actions that cannot be completed immediately must be tracked through the LBNL Corrective Action Tracking System (CATS). The program elements and requirements are described in the LBNL Issues Management Program (PUB-5519 (1)).
Line management, with assistance from EH&S and OIA, also perform root cause analyses and develop lessons learned to prevent problems from recurring. Such activity is commensurate with the risk, significance, and consequence of the problem.