Small update to 9.02

While looking at what guidance we had on electronic signatures, we discovered (IAS really) that the RPM seemed to assign a line responsibility to them to certify control sufficiency for applications which use electronic signatures. No one seems to be quite sure where this requirement came from, but it seems outside the scope of UC IAS to certify as to sufficiency. We revised 9.02(D)(10)(e)(ii) to reflect the assignment of this responsibility to the application owner (and by extension, their line management).

http://www.lbl.gov/Workplace/RPM/R9.02.html#RTFToC40